Embracing Faceless Content Generation for Online Media Incentives in an Era of Rewarding Content Monetisation
Keywords:
Content, Content Monetisation, Era of Rewarding Content Monetisation, Faceless Content CreationAbstract
Rapid changes in the digital media economy have given rise to new content-production models. One increasingly prominent model is faceless content creation, in which creators produce and monetise digital content without publicly revealing their personal identities on platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram. This study examines how faceless content creation intersects with online media incentives, with particular attention to the ways anonymity, automation, and algorithmic optimisation reshape the economics of digital content production. Using the Political Economy of Media theory, the study investigates the motivational, structural, and technological factors that influence creators’ adoption of faceless strategies. The study adopted a mixed-methods design, drawing on content analysis of 50 purposively selected faceless creator channels and interviews with 20 creators and 15 consumers. The data were analysed using thematic, interpretive, and descriptive techniques. The findings indicate that psychological factors, including privacy concerns and social anxiety; economic considerations, particularly lower production costs; and geographic constraints influence faceless content creation. The study also revealed that faceless content expands participation in the creator economy but raises concerns regarding authenticity, credibility, and accountability, particularly in AI-assisted production environments. The study concludes that faceless content creation is a structurally embedded feature of platform capitalism in which value is increasingly generated through audience attention and algorithmic visibility rather than personal identity. The study recommends that creators adopt data-driven niche strategies, diversify income streams, and practise transparent disclosure when using AI-assisted production; it also recommends that platform administrators and policymakers develop transparent monetisation frameworks and strengthen digital literacy initiatives to support equitable and accountable participation in the digital content economy.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd Ed.). Polity Press.
Comes, B. (2025). Blurring the line: Digital anonymity, deception, and the crisis of online authenticity. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(10), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1210.19500
Congruence Market Insights. (2024). Global creator economy market report 2024–2032. https://www.congruencemarketinsights.com/report/creator-economy-market
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. New York University Press.
Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.
Eklund, L., von Essen, E., Jonsson, F., & Johansson, M. (2022). Beyond a dichotomous understanding of online anonymity: Bridging the macro and micro level. Sociological Research Online, 27(2), 486 – 503. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211019760
Fuchs, C. (2012). Dallas Smythe today: The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory: Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 692 – 740. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.443
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Hofstetter, R., & Gollnhofer, J. F. (2024). The creator’s dilemma: Resolving tensions between authenticity and monetization in social media. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(3), 427 – 435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.001
Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377 – 386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. NYU Press.
Kuscu, A., & Özkaya, E. (2023). Content creators’ participation in the creator economy: Examining the effect of creators’ content sharing frequency on user engagement behavior on digital platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, Article 103345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103345
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159 – 174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114 – 133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nam, S. (2024). Who gets paid (for) what? The cultural political economy of news content in generative AI. Journalism https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241287835
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. O’Reilly Media. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D. A., & Sorescu, A. (2024). The creator economy: An introduction and a call for scholarly research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(3), 403 – 410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.005
Smythe, D. W. (1981). Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada. Ablex Publishing.
Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3), 1–27.
Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave. Bantam Books.
